In regards to planning, I created a GoogleDoc to outline topics for Janet and I to address. With that, I initially wanted us to relate the site to new media as much as possible. After speaking with professor Morgen those topics and ideas shifted because we realized that HowStuffWorks is like an online Encyclopedia. The topics we choose to focus on was the multiple media platforms, the audience, and employment along with other details. We addressed the new media and old media aspects of the site. In addition, the podcast was structure to where we were addressing topics discussed in class and available on the class page – this includes the Key terms for Podcast Analysis, APATSARC,and Rhetorical Composition.
Furthermore, editing the audio did not take as much time as I thought it would. We recorded topics in segments just for organization and future editing purposes. WHile recording the podcast for WestWorld, we were not thinking ahead about editing so we recorded essentially one really long audio file. When it came to editing, it was hard to find the areas we wanted to include in the final cut. While recording for HowStuffWorks, we set topics for each of us to talk about so we could go on from there. The questions that Janet asked me were scripted and I set general points to address for each question she asked. We wanted the podcast to sound more conversational so we both made an effort. Personally, I think it was easier for me this time around to speak more freely about topics beyond the “script” because I am familiar with the site. Thus, my parts of the podcast did not sound as scripted as they did WestWorld’s podcast. I did see a lot of improvement in this podcast episode specifically by addressing more things we learned and discussed in class along with the skills I obtained from WestWorld and HONY podcasts.
Along with the topics I previously mentioned, we also addressed the content offered on the site, interactivity, business/employment, and how to request and generate content. I appreciated how organized we were while planning and recording this podcast. In comparison to our previous podcast, we did not re record as much and had a solid idea on what to talk about. I noticed a lot of improvement but also areas for further improvement (specifically scripted-ness). I really wanted to incorporate class readings in the podcast so I’m happy we did that. By no means am I an expert on producing podcast but the planning, recording, and editing process was not as frustrating as it was the first time. It was still a challenge to create interesting topics to talk about but it was less difficult because I felt more comfortable talking about HowStuffWorks. Overall, I am very satisfied with our finished product.
]]>Here, we’ll be taking a look to see if there is some correlation between location of these colleges, accesses, financial availability and fund provisions for these top 20 colleges. We’ll be considering various factors to find similarities and dissimilarities between the states. Maybe region contributes to where the top mobility colleges are located where they are and why they are so successful? Maybe there are external variables missing or contributing? Although finding a definite correlation between college location and upward mobility is unlikely, we still find it interesting to compare the top 20 colleges in this way.
The data presented in these graphs were obtained from Equality of Opportunity College Level Characteristics. Graph 1 compares the location of the top 20 colleges and graph 2 compares the locations of all 190 colleges from the data. The top 20 colleges are highlighted in a separate graph for they had the highest mobility rates out of 190 colleges in the data. Looking at graph 1, 75% ofthe top 20 colleges are in the northeast, 15% are in the south and 10% are in the West. These top 20 ranking colleges in the data set provide the highest upward mobility of students enrolled. These colleges are less selective than Emory for instance but their mobility rate exceeds Emory along with other top ranking colleges like Harvard, Stanford, Duke, etc. Here, we’ll be taking a look to see if there is some correlation between location of these colleges, accesses, financial availability and fund provisions for these top 20 colleges. We’ll be considering these factors to find similarities or dissimilarities between the opportunities provided regionally and how that contributes to where the top mobility colleges are located where they are and why they are so successful.
]]>
Featured Image: Present
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>

]]>